Monday, October 14, 2013

FDA Electoral Finance Report on the 2010 Calgary Mayoral Election: Separating Fact from Fiction

Foundation for Democratic Advancement image by lvdesign.ca

Executive Summary

This FDA electoral finance study focuses on the 2010 Calgary Mayoral Election. The main purpose of the research is to tabulate the amount of contributions for all candidates. As the research progressed, further inquiry was made into the reporting system used by the City of Calgary, within provincial legislation. (2013 election finance data is not publicly disclosed until after Election Day on October 21, 2013; only voluntary and incomplete financial data is available now.)

Our results indicate that the top three candidates accounted for two-thirds of total campaign financing or 67 percent. The FDA also observed a wide variation between candidates with respect to the proportion of financing originating from different types of contributors. This includes distinctions based on contribution amount (under $100 versus over $100), and contribution source (individuals versus business versus unions). For example, 95.9 percent of gross contributions to all mayoral candidates were over $100, while 4.1 percent of gross contributions to all mayoral candidates were under $100. Also, 51.1 percent of total contributions to mayoral candidates were from corporations.

The FDA concludes that electoral finance process in the 2010 City of Calgary mayoral election had a number of shortcomings, which in turn likely impacted the electoral fairness of the election, and the correlation between the voice of Calgarians and the election results.

The FDA acknowledges that the root issue stems from Alberta's Local Authorities Election Act, which the Alberta Provincial Government has jurisdiction over. However, the FDA believes that the City of Calgary still has the ability to improve the electoral finance process. For example, for modest costs, the City Calgary can upgrade and standardize the way campaign finances are reported to the City by candidates, and subsequently reported by the City to the general public.

Questions

Do you know the electoral finance history of the 2010 Calgary Mayoral Election?

Do you know that three mayoral candidates had 67% of the electoral finances of all mayoral candidates (ten three mayoral candidates in total)?

Do you that contributions by corporations accounted for 51.5% of the total contributions to mayoral candidates, without considering any individuals who may have contributed for corporations?

Do you know that there were 99 incidents of individuals and corporations contributing to more than one candidate and totaling $595,333. (Note, we are not making an ethical judgment, and there are no municipal laws against contributing to more than one candidate. Our goals are to gauge the frequency and financial scope of this phenomenon.)

Do you know that 95.5% of gross contributions to all mayoral candidates were over $100, while 4.1% of gross contributions to all mayoral candidates were under $100?


Relevant Links

FDA Electoral Finance Report on the 2010 Calgary Mayoral Election

Stakeholder Advisory


 

No comments:

Leave a Comment

Thank you for sharing your perspective.